Saturday, September 14, 2013

TOW 1 - Overpopulation Article (Erle C. Ellis)


There is a common belief that the dangers of overpopulation will prevent humanity from progressing past a certain point. Scholars, from centuries ago such as Thomas Malthus or from today, often support this theory with graphs and research, but Erle C. Ellis condones those intellectuals. Ellis, a biologist and associate professor of geography and environmental systems at the University of Maryland, has admit to believing this idea himself, but after realizing its flaws, he explains it as simple misconception of ecology. Ellis strives to convince his audience of the error in this theory that human methods of exploiting the planet’s resources will result in its demise.  By portraying the original theory as stupid and trivial, in the same way a school bully degrades children, Ellis bullies the reader into believing his theory. Though this tactic may seem childish and shameful, it is emotionally and logically effective in pointing out the flaws in any mindset besides Ellis’s. Emphasizing the historical pattern, Ellis explains that humans have manipulated nature since the beginning of time and it is that manipulation that has sustained populations’ survival, therefore contradicting the theory that humans must adapt to the fully natural environment. Logical thought is Ellis’s primary approach to appealing to his audience, as that Ellis targets a specific group of scholars. Referencing terms and people such as niche, Anthropocene, and Thomas Malthus, specifies the audience to only a group of educated people who would understand the allusion. This is both beneficial and damaging to Ellis’s purpose: Ellis pled to scholars who would empathize and perhaps agree with his opinion, but because Ellis wanted the theory to be widespread and generally accepted, he fails to appeal to a wide enough audience. However, if the theory against the danger of overpopulation were to be accepted by scholars, it could be broadcast to the public. By specifying his audience, Ellis limits the chances of his theory becoming common belief, and in that aspect, Ellis fails to achieve his purpose.


No comments:

Post a Comment