Love is never simple. After
devouring this scientific marvel of a book, Tennov makes it clear that the
popular notions of love tend to be faulty misconceptions. One must consider all
of the various types of love, which, after an extensive and lengthy Google
search, can be summed up in four general types: affection, friendship, romance,
and unconditional. Tennov explores the depth of limerence, a sentiment
bordering between infatuation and love but is not necessarily either. Honing in
on a controversial theory in the psychological community, Tennov delves into
the reality of limerence and its threatening potential using credible
consensuses and graphic metaphors.
Tennov’s
work demonstrates that she has the mind of a researcher: whether collecting her
own data or generating theses from experts, Tennov strings together a variety
of evidence to reach a valid conclusion. The foundation of Tennov’s study began
with a compilation of student opinions, all stating very similar experiences in
love. After analyzing these and identifying the trends, the conclusion Tennov
develops is not only logical for herself, but also to the reader. If all the
evidence points to the conclusion Tennov draws, no matter how strange or
unaccepted, then it is only sensible to accept her thesis as rational.
Drawing
parallels between complex, experimental concepts and simple, daily-life
functions creates a sense of comfort within the reader making the text easier
to understand. Toys and games are at the comprehensive level of a toddler. Therefore,
when Tennov states “you find
yourself a player in a process (love) that bears unquestionable similarity to a
game,” the simplicity of one idea transcends to the other” (67). An extremely
sophisticated style of writing, the comparisons Tennov uses allows the readers
to study complex thoughts on an understandable level. If the simple-minded can
accept her thesis as true, then it is at least worth exploring the validity of
that theory.
What are
usually just words on paper are transformed into real-life situations through
Tennov’s provoking and thoughtful analysis. Skeptics cannot deny that Tennov’s studies
and evidence are cogent if not concrete; the ingenuous peoples who are not
well-versed in scientific jargon cannot deny that Tennov’s theories make sense.
If the two opposite ends of a spectrum, educated versus the… less educated, can
accept a theory, everything else should simply fall into place.
No comments:
Post a Comment